Managing America: 200
+ Years of Economic Repetition; the Upwave and Downwave Economic Cycle
It is the early 1930s.
A stooped emaciated figure trudges in chains through the dreary Siberian
landscape and disappears into history - one of the hundreds of thousands who
die in Stalin's prison camps. His name, Nikolai Dmitrievich Kondratieff.
Occupation: Economist. Crime: Thinking for himself. 'Forbes', November 9, 1981
Kondratieff studied the work of several economists who were
attempting to discern a pattern of rhythmic regularity in the ebb and flow of
international and domestic trade.
While John Maynard Keynes was sipping champagne in well-appointed
Edwardian drawing-rooms, formulating an economic policy for manipulating our
way out of the depression of the 1930s when that depression was nearing an end,
Kondratieff was thinking in much grander terms and pondering the long sweep of world
economic history.
While most economists of that time were concerned with trade
cycles of three, five and fifteen years, Kondratieff noticed a much longer term
business cycle repetition.
He questioned the nature of the waves of prosperity and
adversity ebbing and flowing in price sequences spanning hundreds of years.
These upswings and downswings seemed to persist throughout
the period following the Industrial Revolution in all industrialized nations,
regardless of political party or economic policy. Kondratieff concluded there
was a supreme order in our economic affairs, an uncontrollable order involving
great tides of economic activity capable of humbling economists and plundering
politicians.
Kondratieff's theory was originally published in German
under the title, 'Die langen Wellen der Konjunktur'.
His paper first appeared in 1926 in the 'Archiv fur
Soziakuissenschaft and Sozialpolitik'.
Kondratieff said: “The upswing in the first long wave embraces the period from 1789 to
1874, i.e. 25 years; its decline begins in 1814 and ends in 1849, a period of
35 years. The cycle is therefore completed in 60 years. The rise in the second
wave begins in 1849 and ends in 1873, lasting 24 years. The decline of the
second wave begins in 1873 and ends in 1896, a period of 23 years. The length
of the second wave is 47 years. The upward movement of the third wave begins in
1896 and ends in 1920, its duration 24 years. The decline of the wave,
according to all data, begins in 1920.”
Kondratieff never lived to see the startling conclusion to
this third wave. The price cycle actually peaked in 1920. It led to a downwave
lasting 20 years, involving the Great Depression, and the completion of another
long wave lasting 44 years.
America’s current position within the long wave cycle is
just about where it is when Kondratieff's work would have projected the wave -about
sixty year cycle.
How does this historic
economic long wave cycle relate to America?
Politically and Economically Viewing American History
James Madison was
President, at the peak of the first American upwave in 1814. He was elected in 1808, re-elected in 1812,
and voted out in 1816, two years after the peak of the first upwave. James
Madison was a liberal or 'left wing' politician by today's definition. James
Monroe, who succeeded him, would have been described as right wing.
At the peak of the second American upwave in 1864, Abraham
Lincoln was President. He could have been called left of center. In 1868,
Ulysses S. Grant took office, 4 years after the peak of the second upwave, President
Grant was a right-wing politician.
The Third Wave in the late 1890s, prices inched up again.
From 1896, right through to the late 1930s, what had happened twice during the
preceding 150 years, happened again.
In the Fourth wave prices rose steadily until 1929, business
was booming, prices peaked and the commodity market crashed. Hundreds of small
investors in America and Britain went bankrupt speculating in Argentine companies
and a host of new private companies of dubious merit. The financial crisis in a
speculative market led to the recession of 1930, the third time since the 1780s,
which caused the world to plunge into deep depression until 1939. Herbert Hoover was president in the 1920’s- a
conservative- and Franklin Roosevelt was president from 1933 to 1945, a
liberal.
There was enough strength left in the system to improve the
American economy until World War Two with the enactment of the Lend Lease Act
in 1941.
The start of the fifth wave, President Ronald Reagan, a
conservative, begins his term in 1981 at the end of a period of high prices and
high interest rates under President James Carter, a liberal. William Clinton,
could be called a right of center liberal, became president in 1994 at the pre-peak
of the upwave which peaked in 2007.
America’s now in year five of the
twenty-five year economic downwave with President Obama a liberal politician.
United States foreign policy started after the American
Revolution with the themes that were expressed in George Washington's farewell
address to all nations.
These policies became the British base policy of the
Hamilton lead Federalist Party which favored a strong federal government in the 1780s that differ from his rival Thomas
Jefferson lead Republican Party which favored States Rights and relations with France and lead to an alliance with France, which resulted in declaring the war on
Britain in 1812.
George Washington's
farewell address: “Harmony, liberal intercourse with all nations, are
recommended by policy, humanity, and interest.”
“But even our commercial policy should hold an equal and
impartial hand; neither seeking nor granting exclusive favors or preferences;
consulting the natural course of things; diffusing and diversifying by gentle
means the streams of commerce, but forcing nothing; establishing (with powers
so disposed, in order to give trade a stable course, to define the rights of
our merchants, and to enable the government to support them) conventional rules
of intercourse, the best that present circumstances and mutual opinion will
permit, but temporary, and liable to be from time to time abandoned or varied,
as experience and circumstances shall dictate; constantly keeping in view that
it is folly in one nation to look for disinterested favors from another; that
it must pay with a portion of its independence for whatever it may accept under
that character; that, by such acceptance, it may place itself in the condition
of having given equivalents for nominal favors, and yet of being reproached
with ingratitude for not giving more.”
“There can be no greater error than to expect or calculate
upon real favors from nation to nation. It is an illusion, which experience
must cure, which a just pride ought to discard.”
International
trade became American economic foreign policy, we now import more goods that we
export and we now have to borrow funds to pay one-third of our Federal spending
budget.
Is this an economic
sound policy?
"It is incumbent on every generation to pay its own debts as it
goes. A principle which if acted on would save one-half the wars of the
world." Thomas Jefferson
Mr. Martin Chekel, a noted international businessman and
author of the thought provoking “Managing America” six book series and the
retrospective eight book series “The Diary of American Foreign Policy 1938 –
1945” that laid the foundation for US foreign policy the past seventy-four
years.
No comments:
Post a Comment